首页> 外文OA文献 >A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project
【2h】

A new approach to assessing the health benefit from obesity interventions in children and adolescents: the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity project

机译:评估儿童和青少年肥胖干预措施对健康的益处的新方法:评估肥胖项目的成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To report on a new modelling approach developed for the assessing cost-effectiveness in obesity (ACE-Obesity) project and the likely population health benefit and strength of evidence for 13 potential obesity prevention interventions in children and adolescents in Australia. METHODS: We used the best available evidence, including evidence from non-traditional epidemiological study designs, to determine the health benefits as body mass index (BMI) units saved and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) saved. We developed new methods to model the impact of behaviours on BMI post-intervention where this was not measured and the impacts on DALYs over the child\u27s lifetime (on the assumption that changes in BMI were maintained into adulthood). A working group of stakeholders provided input into decisions on the selection of interventions, the assumptions for modelling and the strength of the evidence. RESULTS: The likely health benefit varied considerably, as did the strength of the evidence from which that health benefit was calculated. The greatest health benefit is likely to be achieved by the \u27Reduction of TV advertising of high fat and/or high sugar foods and drinks to children\u27, \u27Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding\u27 and the \u27multi-faceted school-based programme with an active physical education component\u27 interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of consistent methods and common health outcome measures enables valid comparison of the potential impact of interventions, but comparisons must take into account the strength of the evidence used. Other considerations, including cost-effectiveness and acceptability to stakeholders, will be presented in future ACE-Obesity papers. Information gaps identified include the need for new and more effective initiatives for the prevention of overweight and obesity and for better evaluations of public health interventions.
机译:目的:报告一种新的建模方法,该方法用于评估肥胖症的成本效益(ACE-Obesity)项目,以及可能的人口健康益处和澳大利亚13种潜在的预防肥胖症儿童和青少年干预措施的证据强度。方法:我们使用了最佳的证据,包括来自非传统流行病学研究设计的证据,来确定健康益处,如保存的体重指数(BMI)单位和保存的残疾调整生命年(DALYs)。我们开发了新的方法来模拟行为对干预后BMI的影响,这种行为没有被测量,并且对儿童一生中对DALY的影响进行了建模(假设BMI的变化一直保持到成年)。利益相关者工作组为干预措施的选择,建模的假设和证据的强度提供了决策依据。结果:可能的健康益处差异很大,计算健康益处的证据强度也不尽相同。减少对儿童的高脂和/或高糖食品和饮料的电视广告,腹腔镜可调式胃镜带和基于学校的多方面计划可能会获得最大的健康益处。积极的体育教育成分\ u27干预。结论:使用一致的方法和共同的健康结果测量值可以对干预措施的潜在影响进行有效比较,但是比较必须考虑所使用证据的强度。其他考虑因素,包括成本效益和利益相关者的接受程度,将在未来的ACE-Obesity论文中介绍。查明的信息空白包括需要采取新的,更有效的措施来预防超重和肥胖症,以及更好地评估公共卫生干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号